
ArmInfo. The Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia requests slightly more than $1 million to ensure representation and proper protection of the interests of the Republic of Armenia in the arbitration case Liormand Holdings Limited et al. v. the Republic of Armenia, which is being conducted by the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce (SCC Arbitration Institute).
As stated in the explanatory note to the document, in this arbitration case, the plaintiffs filed a Notice of International Investment Dispute with the Office of the International Counsel on June 30, 2019, which was followed by proceedings related to the Emergency Arbitration. After receiving the decision on the results of the Emergency Arbitration on July 22, 2019, the Office began work on attracting international legal consultants to represent and properly protect the interests of the Republic of Armenia.
"According to the Dispute Resolution Rules of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, a party may file a Notice of Arbitration within 30 days from the date of receipt of the award in the Emergency Arbitration Proceedings. On August 12, 2019, during the consideration of the candidacies of law firms, the Office was notified of the Notice of Arbitration by the Arbitration Institute of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, which had already set short procedural deadlines. Thus, the relevance of involving a company providing legal and attorney advice is due to the need to provide appropriate legal positions within the established deadlines in the arbitration proceedings and ensure effective protection of the interests of the Republic of Armenia," the document says.
As a result of studying the price offers, it is noted that Arnold & Porter, a company operating in the United States of America, stood out for the exceptional value of its services and extensive experience, which has been successful in 53 of the last 60 decisions (success in about 93% of cases), especially in cases on the protection of state interests in investment arbitration. For representing the interests of the Republic of Armenia in the said case, the company offered a total of USD 3,250,000, which does not include applicable taxes established by the legislation of the Republic of Armenia, expert fees, arbitration costs, translation and printing costs, as well as other expenses (transportation costs and accommodation costs), etc.
"The company will have to ensure payment from the moment of actual provision of services, even before concluding a contract with the latter for the provision of services. Therefore, the effect of this decision applies to the relations that have actually arisen, and it is necessary to allocate to the Office of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Armenia an amount equivalent to USD 1,093,750.0 in AMD (including applicable taxes established by the legislation of the Republic of Armenia) in the second half of 2025," noted in the Office of the Head of the Armenian Cabinet.
Recall that on July 22, the Stockholm Arbitration Court obliged the Armenian government to refrain from applying the amendments to the laws "On Energy" and "On the Public Services Regulatory Authority" recently adopted by the parliament, as well as from any further steps aimed at the expropriation of the ENA. Following the publication of the arbitration decision, the state bodies of the Republic of Armenia made a number of statements, noting that the decisions of the emergency arbitration cannot be executed by the government of the Republic of Armenia, and in order to be executed in the territory of the Republic of Armenia, they must be recognized by the courts of the Republic of Armenia."
In this regard, on July 29, 2025, Samvel Karapetyan and his family again applied to the Emergency Arbitration Court with a request to amend the decision made on July 22 and provide the Government of the Republic of Armenia with additional clarifications that the latter is obliged to implement the arbitration award and restore the status quo that existed on the date of the investors' first appeal, as well as oblige it to submit a report on the measures taken to implement the award. On August 4, 2025, the Emergency Arbitration Court decided not to consider the issue of the need to amend the previously adopted award, reiterating that the decision it made on July 22 is already subject to mandatory and immediate execution by the Government of the Republic of Armenia.
On August 11, 2025, Samvel Karapetyan and his family formally initiated international arbitration proceedings against the Republic of Armenia to hold the Republic of Armenia accountable for the expropriation of ESA CJSC.
"The Karapetyan family alleges in their arbitration claim that the actions of the Republic of Armenia are arbitrary, discriminatory, politically motivated and aimed at depriving them of their ownership rights to the ENA. In particular, these actions violate a number of obligations undertaken by the Republic of Armenia under the bilateral investment treaty between Armenia and Cyprus. First, Armenia failed to ensure fair and equitable treatment and full protection of the Karapetyan family and their investments. Second, the violent takeover of the ENA management constitutes an unlawful expropriation by Armenia in violation of an international treaty. The Karapetyan family asks the arbitration tribunal to oblige the Republic of Armenia to compensate for both the damages already incurred and those expected. According to the preliminary assessment, the amount of damage is 500 million US dollars and is subject to a final assessment by the arbitration tribunal," the statement of the Council for the Defense of Samvel Karapetyan said.