ArmInfo. Today, the international community is critical of Azerbaijan's actions in Artsakh. Ara Ghazaryan, an international law specialist and lawyer, made this statement on November 14 during a press conference on "The Impact of Azerbaijani Aggression on Human Rights and Environmental Protection." At the same time, he noted that, in contrast, the Azerbaijani authorities continue to demand the return of their citizens to Armenia.
Ghazaryan pointed out that the Azerbaijani authorities are thus trying to conceal their own crimes in Artsakh. He emphasized that Azerbaijan's crimes could come to light during international trials, and to avoid this, official Baku is taking preventive measures, such as demanding Armenia to withdraw its claims. When asked about the appropriate legal terminology to describe Azerbaijan's actions, the lawyer noted that the legal classification varies depending on the goal. In this regard, he explained that Azerbaijan consistently attempts to portray ethnic cleansing as a consequence of the war in its legal proceedings. "Two countries are at war, and therefore, cities and villages can be destroyed," Ghazaryan explained referring to Azerbaijan's attempts to conceal its own crimes.
At the same time, according to the lawyer, international courts are not political platforms where the party with more resources wins. He is convinced that the priority is still given to the rule of law there. "Azerbaijan is afraid of trials because the truth becomes evident in them. We have seen how Armenia, one could say, has already prevailed in two cases, or rather, in their rejection," Ghazaryan explained. This is why, according to him, Azerbaijan is trying to appeal to the narrative of the so-called right of Azerbaijanis to return to Armenia. "When Armenia tries to promote the right of return to Artsakh, Azerbaijan balances this issue by referring to the 1992-1994 war, however, as confirmed by the court decision of November 12, we must start studying the facts from 1996," the international law specialist continued. At the same time, as Ghazaryan notes, this is not the first case of a protracted process in international courts: there are cases in the European Court of Human Rights for which decisions have not yet been made. He noted that Azerbaijan understands that the more time passes, the heavier their burden will be, because they cannot deny the right of the Artsakh people to return.
"In practice they do not do this. Instead, they present various counterarguments, such as the right of Azerbaijanis to return to Armenia," the expert explained. The lawyer further explained that the right to return is connected to the concept of the homeland, which in turn is tied to the nation and other concepts like home, church, history, and so on. "Therefore, they do not say that they left their homes in Armenia, but assert that they left their homeland there. It is not without reason that Aliyev always talks about "Western Azerbaijan," the expert emphasized.
However, as Ghazaryan explained, a country that emerges victorious in the military arena may still encounter defeat in the International Court. "We saw how numerous myths of Azerbaijan were dispelled, and Armenia received a certain advantage, including in the context of the right to return. The right to return encompasses not only going back to one's home, but also returning to one's homeland. The homeland has nothing to do with politics. The homeland includes dozens of components of the European Convention on Human Rights, including the component of exercising the right to return. It remains to realize this right through our efforts," the expert concluded. Recall that due to Azerbaijan's full-scale military aggression of on September 19, 2023 against Nagorno- Karabakh, which followed a nine-month blockade, about 109 thousand citizens of Artsakh were forcibly displaced to Armenia. In total, since the 44-day Artsakh war in 2020, 150,000 Artsakh residents have been left homeless.