ArmInfo. The draft schedule of the delimitation and demarcation of the borders between Armenia and Azerbaijan submitted for ratification to the National Assembly of Armenia is completely unconstitutional.
This was stated by Armen Rustamyan, a member of parliament from the opposition faction "Armenia", at the plenary session of the National Assembly on October 22.
According to him, the regulation in no way meets the state interests of the country. "The discussions held the day before in the NA Committee on International Relations once again convinced us that the submitted draft law is illegal, especially since no full-fledged answer was given to the questions raised. All the answers were evasive, but the questions continue to "hang in the air", and I believe that the people understand perfectly well what is at stake," the oppositionist said, pointing to the fact that there is no similar process in Azerbaijan itself, which in itself is nonsense.
Rustamyan reminded that the regulations must be ratified simultaneously, but the situation shows that Baku will not take this step, or ratify it with reservations unacceptable to the Armenian side, which carries risks for Armenia. For this reason, the MP emphasized, the faction will not take part in the discussions and voting on the document submitted by the RA government.
On August 30, Yerevan and Baku signed a regulation on the joint activities of the commissions for delimitation and demarcation of the state border. The regulations were adopted by the Armenian government at a meeting on September 5. In particular, they provide for the organization of delimitation work, the adoption of relevant documents, the preparation of a protocol-description of the crossing of the state border, the preparation of a delimitation map of the appropriate scale, as well as the work of expert groups. It is also noted that the regulations and documents that will be adopted on its basis will supplement the legal basis for ensuring the full course of delimitation work. The regulations provide for the regulation of procedural issues between the two countries after the signing of the state border treaty. On September 26, the Constitutional Court recognized the regulations as consistent with the Constitution.