ArmInfo. France is unable to provide security for Armenia even in theory, because it lacks the required military logistics. This statement was made by the renowned Russian scientist, Iranologist, and expert on regional issues Karine Gevorgyan, in an interview with
ArmInfo. ArmInfo correspondent inquired about the reasons behind Yerevan's decision to gradually replace Russian border guards on its borders, and whether this decision could be linked to the expansion of the Armenia-EU partnership agenda, to which the expert noted that there are two factors at play in the withdrawal of Russian border guards from the Armenian-Iranian border: Armenian and Russian. She further mentioned that the situation on the Russian side cannot be called perfect and this can be multiplied by a thousand and misrepresented in Armenia, which is obvious. "Politicians can resort to this, and it is not so important under whose pressure," Gevorgyan said.
At the same time, she finds the statement by the Prime Minister of Armenia Nikol Pashinyan, that the security of communications through Syunik can be ensured jointly by Russian and Armenian border guards to be intriguing. "This is clearly a nod towards Moscow. But I believe that Tehran's perspective should not be disregarded in this matter. The Iranian side may not be in the foreground to discuss this issue, but it is evident that this is a crucial matter for them," the expert said.
At the same time, she brought up another issue. Gevorgyan pointed out that in the Armenian expert community, there is a growing sentiment that Armenia is shifting towards the West. Criticism of Russia's policy in the South Caucasus is also on the rise, however, it tends to be more superficial and symbolic, rather than profound and meaningful. "This is due to the fact that there is a lack of understanding of what is happening in Russia itself, as it is currently in a transitional state. Among other things, there is a slow and painful change of elites," the Russian expert noted. She also believes that Armenia's reliance on France, which is currently facing challenges, is short-sighted. "But that's not the point. I get the impression that people, advocating for Armenian-French defense relations, have not studied geography well," Gevorgyan said. She pointed out that there is no military logistics, and France cannot even theoretically ensure Armenia's security. "Only Iran has military logistics to protect Armenia, directly, because there is a common border. This border is important to Iran, as it affects its own security," the expert noted.
According to her, this can also be done by India, which supplies Armenia with weapons through the same territory of Iran, and Tehran allows these military supplies to pass. "Sorry, but you can't bring CAESAR self-propelled artillery units by plane - this can only be done by land. The French do not have military transport aircraft like the Russians. This can only be done through Iran. Can you imagine how this should happen?" the expert asked, adding that this is completely unthinkable.
According to her, Russia is another country that can guarantee Armenia's security - through the Caspian Sea and again through Iran. Gevorgyan believes that this is the actual military logistics that can safeguard Armenia's security. "Why tell the people about France?" she asked. At the same time, she acknowledged that Russia's policy in the post-Soviet space had been unsuccessful, putting its own security on risk, as evidenced by Ukraine. Gevorgyan expressed hope that Russia would still be able to get out of this stalemate.
When asked about the potential impact of current processes in the Middle East on Iran's position in the South Caucasus, the expert noted that Iran, as a large country, . She is confident that Israel alone does not have the resources to wage war with Iran. "I remember the Pentagon report from 2010, when Iran was not yet the Iran it is today - with a hypersonic missile. Even then, they claimed that bombing would not be enough for an operation against Iran - this is not Iraq. A ground operation would be necessary, involving up to 800,000 troops. Is there nowhere to get them today? In addition, NATO's arsenal has been depleted to a certain extent by events in the Middle East and Ukraine. Even the United States does not have the capacity to begin producing weapons in large quantities for objective reasons," she said. She added that America would need up to 8 years to get everything on the necessary military track.
Simultaneously, Gevorgyan believes that a polycentric world could be established, with the creation of a specific currency and economic zone, that could potentially include resource-rich countries such as Russia, Iran, India and African countries. "It is noticeable that Russian diplomacy is working intensively in the African direction, not only diplomacy, but also PMCs. Therefore, I am optimistic," she said. Based on the above, the Russian expert expressed confidence that any important communication decisions made on the South Caucasus by certain external forces have no chance of being implemented according to the " letter of the law" and will be transformed. In this regard, she expressed the conviction that there is no need to hurry and .