ArmInfo. For Armenia, the implementation of the so-called "Zangezur corridor" is a red line fraught with serious political, economic and military challenges. At the same time, Azerbaijan and Turkey have been promoting it for over a hundred years, since the corridor is of strategic importance to them, regional issues expert Karen Igityan said in an interview with ArmInfo.
In this regard, the expert noted that the Armenian authorities are ready to cede their sovereignty in this territory to a private security company, which, according to him, will subsequently allow Turkey and Azerbaijan to have unimpeded communication with each other.
"For Azerbaijan, stability in the region means only one thing: weakening Armenia to such an extent that it will be able to seize its entire territory. At the media forum in Shushi, even foreign guests, speaking about the territory of Armenia, used the provocative term "Western Azerbaijan". Considering the peace agenda proclaimed by Pashinyan, the appetite of the Azerbaijani authorities has only increased. Now they claim that they have no territorial claims, but later they will announce that this is their historical territory. The scenario will be approximately the same as in Artsakh. They will offer to stay, but will do everything to make people leave," Karen Igityan emphasizes.
According to the expert, most of the problems are rooted in the mentality that the current authorities are instilling. In this regard, he explained that the idea that the Armenian people are weak, that everything is decided for them, and that war should be avoided by any means, since war, according to their logic, is tantamount to defeat, is actively spreading among society. At the same time, the expert insists that the so- called Zangezur corridor is a red line only for the Armenian state, but not for the Armenian authorities.
"Azerbaijan succeeds in many things only because Armenia does not oppose Baku's actions, and sometimes even plays along with it. But if the Armenian authorities stand on the side of state interests and carry out systematic work, this will greatly limit the influence of Azerbaijan and Turkey in the region. However, it is worth understanding that Armenia is not able to do this alone. There are countries with which we either have the same interests now, or can potentially coincide if the right policy is pursued," the expert said.
He also explained that the "idea" of the current authorities to turn Armenia into a crossroads of the world is unrealistic in the current geopolitical conditions. Moreover, as the expert explained, the authorities are trying to create a myth that Armenia allegedly has great benefits in implementing this project, thereby justifying their political decisions. "People who operate with this mythical argument, as you can see, never cite figures. The net profit of the Georgian Railway for the first half of the year amounted to several million dollars. We are talking about small amounts in the case of Armenia as well. Therefore, this project will not lead it out of the crisis. But if Azerbaijan manages to implement the so-called , they will be able to cut off the North-South corridor through the whole of Armenia," the expert explained.
Igityan also touched upon the positions of other regional players. According to him, Iran clearly understands that the "Zangezur corridor" is necessary to cut off Armenia from Iran, block the North-South route and make the route through Azerbaijan the only alternative. This, as the expert explains, will bring Baku significant profits and increase its role and status in the region. Touching upon Russia's position, the expert emphasized that it has undergone significant changes. If earlier, as Igityan notes, Russian representatives repeatedly stated the need to unblock communications exclusively under the sovereignty of the states through whose territory these roads pass, now the current statement by Russian Foreign Minister Lavrov is closer to the corridor concept.
"Russia's position is now closer to what Azerbaijan says, and there are reasons for this. The Armenian authorities are methodically pushing Russia out of Armenia. But having once ceded its sovereignty over the road, Armenia is unlikely to be able to get it back, and Azerbaijan, in turn, has successful experience in pushing Russia out. Thus, the policy pursued by the current Prime Minister of Armenia leads to Russia increasingly perceiving Armenia as a second Ukraine, which is a dangerous trend," Karen Igityan added.
The expert also drew attention to the statements of the US State Department representatives. In his opinion, the West needs peace in the South Caucasus so that resources from Central Asia are redirected through this region, bypassing the control of Russia and Iran. That is why, as Igityan notes, Azerbaijan and Turkey are positioning the so-called as part of just such a project. "Turkey is a NATO member, and Azerbaijan is a reliable energy partner of the European Union, as the European Union itself has declared it. Accordingly, here the West, in particular the US, and to some extent the European Union, with certain reservations, act as allies of Azerbaijan and Turkey," the expert concluded.