
ArmInfo.The problems of Armenia and Azerbaijan are by no means limited to Karabakh. Sergey Markedonov is the leading researcher at the Euro-Atlantic Security Center of the MGIMO Institute for International Studies, expressed this opinion at the international "Caucasus in the 21st Century" conference organized by the Caucasus Institute in Yerevan.
"We see that the conflict is not limited to Nagorno Karabakh exclusively, it is an Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict. And the situation with delimitation and demarcation of borders is another confirmation of this. There are certain problems in the direction of Nakhijevan, Tavush region and, of course, the section of the Goris-Kapan highway. After all, the geography of the conflict spots in the 1980s and early 1990s were the Shahumyan region, Khanlar, Martunashen, Getashen, and those regions were not part of Karabakh.
And when the same West begins to actively address this topic - this is also not Karabakh," he stressed. in the analyst's opinion, the conflict over Karabakh, is also not over. And despite the generally understandable logic of Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev, repeatedly declaring the end of the Karabakh conflict, the conflict is not over, if only because its end will be a peaceful agreement, more or less legitimate in the two societies.
In this light, he noted discontent in connection with the statement of November 9, 2020, not only in Armenia, but also in Azerbaijan, whose society did not fully accept the results of the war. "In this regard, a protest wave has risen in Armenia. At the same time, in Baku, in terms of publicly expressing discontent, the situation is more complicated. The sentiments of society can be judged by the posts and comments on social networks: "Victory was stolen from us", "We were not allowed to take Stepanakert", "Why are foreign soldiers on our territory?" etc. ", he stressed.
The analyst also reminded that not only Armenia, but also the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group insists on the need to clarify the status of Nagorno-Karabakh. Consequently, it is meaningless, to talk about the resolution of the conflict before the resolution of the status issue. Forecasting a decrease in the significance of the Karabakh issue in public perception over time due to the change of generations, the analyst determined this with new priorities of new generations. "We cannot say that all the problems have been resolved. But the central, fundamental part of Karabakh will be omitted" Markedonov summed up.