ArmInfo.Constitutional referendum - Continuation of the struggle between the current and former authorities. A similar opinion was expressed by ArmInfo Vice-Chairman of the Armenian National Congress Aram Manukyan.
"In the statement circulated by our party in support of the constitutional referendum, we once again reaffirmed our position, which we have repeatedly expressed over the past year and a half. The problem around the Constitutional Court needs to be resolved as soon as possible because delay is harmful to the post-revolutionary process of the country's development. Accordingly, the referendum is not the problem of Hrayr Tovmasyan, and especially the other members of the Constitutional Court.
"This is a continuation of the latent, often open struggle between the current and former authorities," he is convinced.
On February 10, Armenian President Armen Sargsyan signed a decree on holding a referendum on constitutional amendments on April 5. Earlier, at an extraordinary sitting of the National Assembly of Armenia on February 6, the deputies voted "for" the issue of the need to adopt amendments to the Constitution, providing for the termination of the powers of the chairman and members of the Constitutional Court for a referendum. We are talking about article 213 of the Constitution governing the tenure of members and the chairman of the Constitutional Court. The adoption of the amendments will allow the resignation of the current composition of the Constitutional Court.
According to the policy, the ANC has always considered and continues to consider this very real legal, constitutional problem in the political light, as standing in the way of the further development of Armenia. In this light, Manukyan considers the existing Constitutional Court as the last refuge of representatives of the previous government, which explains the cohesion of the "former" around this problem. The former is trying to keep this bastion, and society and power to finally crush.
In this light, the politician assesses the actions of the authorities to eliminate the last vestige of the previous government - the Constitutional Court as very belated. According to him, the same problem could be solved a year ago very calmly and, most importantly, without much upheaval. And the "former" would not even have time to rally and fight the government, as they do today. And, accordingly, the people, society would be busy solving completely different, more pressing problems.
The draft amendments to the Constitution, developed by the My Step parliamentary faction, provide for the termination of the powers of the chairman and members of the Constitutional Court, appointed before the 2015 constitutional reform. Seven of the nine judges of the Constitutional Court got there in accordance with the provisions of the Basic Law as amended in 1995 and 2005.
According to the logic of the ruling party, the continued exercise of the powers of judges of the Constitutional Court, appointed before the constitutional reform of 2015, creates a discrepancy between the terms of office of judges appointed by the Constitution of 1995 and appointed by the Constitution of 2005, while the powers of judges appointed after 2015 are generally limited to 12 years. At the same time, the head of the Constitutional Court Hrayr Tovmasyan was elected to this post after the adoption of the new Constitution, but before its entry into force.