
ArmInfo. By nationalizing enterprises, Armenian authorities are following the path of communism, as stated by lawyer Aram Vardevanyan, MP from the opposition "Strong Armenia" faction, from the podium of the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia.
According to him, this raises the question of whether the state can act as an effective manager. International experience shows that it cannot. Nevertheless, the Armenian state either appoints its representatives to nationalized companies or becomes a stakeholder in these enterprises. "Where did this model come from? For instance, Sweden wanted to hold shares in its companies, but nothing of the kind succeeded there. Why, then, are the Armenian authorities purposefully taking this path? The formula expressed by one of the deputies regarding HayPost CJSC is very interesting—namely, that services in state-owned companies should be of a very high standard, as should the salaries of their employees.
But where are the criteria for evaluating the managers of these companies? Such criteria exist for members of parliament, but who can say where the evaluation criteria approved and applied to the heads of state- owned industrial organizations are? Recent years have provided a clear answer to this question: membership in the ruling Civil Contract party or a relationship with an associated party," Vardevanyan noted, urging the ruling faction to answer by what criteria of professionalism Romanos Petrosyan was appointed as the interim manager of Electric Networks of Armenia CJSC. He recalled that an international audit will be conducted at the company. Moreover, there are proposals to apply parliamentary oversight to the performance of new managers at ENA. "And if it turns out that management was ineffective, what will we say? This applies to both government officials and the opposition," the deputy noted, adding that the general public will bear the brunt of the consequences, as the authorities' actions carry a distinct "red hue."