
ArmInfo. Vague and unclear assessments from the international community do not deter, but rather encourage authoritarianism in Armenia. This was stated by Robert Amsterdam, founder and managing partner of Amsterdam and Partners LLP and international lawyer for Strong Armenia party leader Samvel Karapetyan, who supported the Armenia bloc's statement, which critically assessed the interim statement of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) delegation on the elections in Armenia.
"The statement by the Armenia bloc faction is sobering and extremely important. It reveals a bitter reality that some international organizations stubbornly choose to ignore. We cannot talk about 'constructive cooperation' or 'democratic elections' when the regime of Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan openly uses the state's entire punitive arsenal to suppress opponents," Amsterdam wrote in a Facebook post.
He recalled that their law firm's 140-page report already presents evidence of the judicial system being turned into an instrument of the authorities and a coordinated campaign against the Armenian Apostolic Church (AAC). He also noted that he fully agrees with the assessments contained in the Armenia bloc's statement of May 13. "The international community's vague and unclear assessments do not deter, but rather encourage authoritarianism in Armenia. It's time to end double standards. When the fundamental values of the country and the Church are at stake, silence is complicity," the international lawyer concluded.
As a reminder, the Armenia parliamentary faction responded to the interim statement of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) delegation following its visit to Yerevan on May 11-12 regarding the upcoming June 7 elections. The opposition faction accused PACE of a one-sided assessment of the situation in Armenia and of making groundless assertions. The Armenia faction also expressed bewilderment at the fact that some concerns expressed by opposition political forces were simply "heard" while the government's points were presented as confirmed facts, and a number of oral and written comments submitted by its members during the meeting were ignored.