ArmInfo. New political reality of Armenia is irreversible. A similar point of view is shared by Director of the Center for Regional Studies, an associate expert of the "Ukrainian Prism" Foreign Policy Council, Richard Giragosian.
Thus, an Armenian expert in his column in the "European Truth", analyzing the recent events in Armenia, noted that an unexpected and dramatic political crisis in the country made the issue of early elections relevant.
In his conviction, the split in relations between the parliament and Nikol Pashinyan's government caused a crisis that quickly turned into open confrontation, as a result of which the "Republican Party", which previously held the power and still has a majority in the Armenian parliament, along with MPs from "Prosperous Armenia "and ARF" Dashnaktsutyun " parties changed the procedure for the dissolution of parliament and the election of the Prime Minister.
In this light, the political analyst recalled that Armenia in the past has repeatedly experienced serious crises, from the forced resignation of former President Levon Ter-Petrosyan to a terrorist attack on parliament. "But there is reason to say that the country again approached a turning point in its political history. For the Armenian government, these events came as a surprise, especially given that Prosperous Armenia and Dashnaktsutyun, two parties that supported the new law, had played a crucial role in May in the election of Pashinyan to the post of prime minister, supporting his candidacy in the wake of popular protests. But if you take into account the high stakes of today's Armenian policy, this step brings fewer surprises. It gives the former party in power, "Republican party ", a chance to keep parliament under control and stop the processes that will lead to a political defeat in case of early parliamentary elections. This is a desperate step, and the former ruling coalition has every reason for despair. Recently, they witnessed a confident victory of Pashinyan's supporters in the municipal elections in Yerevan, which confirmed the steady popularity of both the Prime Minister of Armenia and his young government. The results of these elections have demonstrated how the former political elite is dying, "Giragosian noted.
At the same time, the expert believes that at least two political lessons should be drawn from the current parliamentary crisis: first, all doubts have disappeared that the current Armenian parliament does not reflect the new political reality and the country needs a new composition of the representative body, which can only be formed through new, free and fair elections. "And the second lesson is that in case of new elections in Armenia, the former pro-government parties -" Republicans "," Prosperous "and" Dashnaks "- may not even overcome the passing barrier and not enter the new parliament - they are too discredited and deeply unpopular. Although, despite the new political reality, the absence of any real and constructive opposition will only do harm, because any government needs constructive criticism and those who are able to hold it accountable for the policy being pursued. Considering that the Pashinyan government is an inexperienced and only gaining political maturity, one-party governance is especially dangerous. Pashinyan, who once in fact was the only critic of the authorities, knows better than anybody else how lack of accountability creates a temptation for any politician, "noted the analyst.
Giragosian is convinced that the current situation creates certain risks for both the current and the former government. Thus, for Republicans and their political allies (who have already left the new government), the fact that they lose political legitimacy, and their popularity keeps falling, creates a real risk of political demise. "But there are risks for Pashinyan too, and they are even more serious. It was planned that the next step in political transformation of Armenia would be Pashinyan's "technical" resignation from the post of prime minister, while simultaneously blocking the nomination of any candidates of his rivals for two weeks. Under the current legislation, this should start the process of dissolving parliament and holding extraordinary elections, but now there is no certainty that Pashinyan's opponents in parliament will fulfill such a plan. Indeed following this plan of not nominating any candidate for the post of prime minister after the government's resignation, will mean that they have decided to take an unprecedented action of political suicide, which is unlikely. In case they nominate a candidacy for prime minister's post, this will make Pashinyan to mobilize his supporters and again bring the demonstrators to the streets to complete the Armenian "velvet revolution", the expert added.
The Armenian analyst believes that the consequences of these processes are far from being positive and, in fact, there is a struggle for legitimacy in Armenia. Giragosian noted that for the government, its legitimacy comes from the "people's mandate", which determines its popularity, and the strength of street protests. "And for the discredited political elite of the past, which has lost public support due to corruption and the lack of free elections, its legitimacy is based on imitated democracy through control of parliament, even if it does not reflect the moods of voters. Despite the difficult situation, one can state that the new political reality of Armenia is irreversible. Former government and pro-government parties are increasingly consistent with the term "former" and with each step closer to the line, after which only brief references of them in the political history of the country will remain ", - concluded the analyst.