
ArmInfo. The Court of Appeal has acknowledged that further delays in the criminal proceedings against Samvel Karapetyan, head of the Tashir Group of Companies, are problematic and lead to a violation of fundamental human rights, as reported by Karapetyan's lawyer, Aram Vardevanyan.
"On October 16, 2025, the Anti-Corruption Court extended Samvel Karapetyan's illegal detention for another month. The court effectively addressed issues with the timing of the criminal prosecution. The investigative body and the prosecutor's office directly ignored the court's decision," Vardevanyan wrote on social media.
Incidentally, both before and after this decision, Karapetyan's defense clearly addressed this issue in written motions, demanding that the case be stopped, and at very least, that the use of secrecy in the preliminary investigation against them be ceased. The lawyers even petitioned for a separation of part of the proceedings and the transfer of "the absurd appellate episode to court, or for the respect of the right and its termination."
"On December 11, 2025, the Court of Appeal, taking into account one of the demands outlined in our petition, clearly stated that the delays (delays) in the criminal proceedings against Samvel Karapetyan are problematic and result in a violation of fundamental human rights. The same Court of Appeal, which had previously rejected our complaint in the context of undeniable political persecution, confirmed this legal stance," Vardevanyan emphasized.
He also reported that motions had been submitted to the Investigative Body requesting active measures to prevent delays in the preliminary investigation, but these motions were denied. "Consequently, the Investigative Body is not taking any active steps; on the contrary, a group of 53 investigators is inactive, despite Samvel Karapetyan being in custody for about six months now, and the only action they have taken is another "unprecedented" operation, where they searched the home of a linguistic expert. According to this expert's conclusion, Samvel Karapetyan's remarks in defense of the AAC did not contain an appeal," Aram Vardevanyan wrote.