
ArmInfo. The results of an examination conducted by the Investigative Committee of Armenia have confirmed that the video recording attributed to Archbishop Arshak Khachatryan, head of the chancery of the Mother See of Etchmiadzin, has no connection to him. This was reported on his Facebook page by Archbishop Arshak's lawyer, Arsen Babayan.
The defense attorney reported that he received by email from the Investigative Committee of Armenia the conclusion of a forensic audio and portrait examination commissioned for the video recording attributed to Archbishop Arshak Khachatryan. He also stated that in more than 15 years of public service and three years of experience as a lawyer, he has never encountered such an absurdity.
According to him, this "conclusion" consists of only one page, more than half of which is taken up by a photograph. In other words, the entire conclusion takes up exactly half a page. Babayan added that this isn't all. He said this "conclusion" completely refutes the information released to the media by the investigative body that "the presence of Archbishop Arshak Khachatryan in the video recording has been confirmed."
"This information is untrue. Look at the expert's conclusion after comparing the man depicted in the video with a photograph of Archbishop Arshak taken from the internet as a reference."
Given the shape of the forehead, nose, and chin of the people in the pictures, as well as their hairstyles and the fact that both are wearing glasses, one can conclude that the photographs depict the same person. So what does this mean? The expert looked at the photographs and said, "Hey, yeah, they look alike." Okay, but when did we say the man in the fake video looks nothing like Archbishop Arshak? When did we say the man in the fake video has lush, curly hair and a graceful, surgically-treated nose? Isn't it obvious that if you show this video and the photograph of Archbishop Arshak to anyone, they'll say, "Hey, yeah, they look alike." Is that your expertise?
And most importantly: although the title of the examination creates the impression that the authenticity of the video recording should have been verified, this was not done. In other words, the investigation wasn't interested in whether the video was real or, for example, created by artificial intelligence. Or could the photograph have been edited?
Based on all this, it can be unequivocally stated that the Investigative Committee has confirmed Archbishop Arshak Khachatryan's statement that the content of the video has nothing to do with him," Babayan wrote.
Previously, a video allegedly depicting Archbishop Arshak with a woman was circulated on pro-government platforms. The video quality is very poor, and only basic facial features are visible. The source of the video is still unknown. The clergyman himself has repeatedly emphasized that he has no connection to the video.