
ArmInfo. The Armenian authorities have violated the RA Constitution, and Daniel Ioannisyan has assumed the role of a lawyer for their unlawful actions, as noted in a statement issued by the Armenian National Congress's legal commission.
The document mentioned that on October 16, the ANC released a statement denouncing the new wave of repression against the Armenian Apostolic Church. Touching upon the charges against the Primate of the Aragatsotn Diocese, Bishop Mkrtich Proshyan, the Armenian National Congress particularly pointed out that they were based on an article of the Criminal Code that wasn't in effect at the time of alleged crime, that is, in 2021. The new edition of the Criminal Code, which included the mentioned article, only entered into force on July 1, 2022.
"Therefore, assessing the act under the new edition of the Criminal Code constitutes a gross violation of Article 72 of the Constitution of the Republic of Armenia. Indeed, Article 163 of the previous Code (Part 2) provided for criminal liability only for "coercion to participate in lawful assemblies with the use of violence or the threat of violence." Daniel Ioannisyan's statement on the alleged act, the committed crime, lacks any mention of violence or threats Consequently; this could not serve as the basis for the charge. Meanwhile, the alleged act that served as the basis for the charge, namely Article 236, Part 3 of the new Criminal Code (coercion to participate in an assembly), "committed through the use of official or official powers or the influence caused by them," is criminalized only by the new edition of the Criminal Code. Therefore, in 2021, it was not considered a crime and could not serve as the basis for initiating a criminal case," the ANC legal commission's statement emphasized.
The authors of the document believe that by bringing charges against Bishop Mkrtich Proshyan and those associated with him, the authorities have grossly violated Article 72 of the RA Constitution, and Daniel Ioannisyan has assumed the role of not only the "chief advocate of the authorities," but also someone who misinforms the society, justifies, and conceals the authorities' unlawful actions.