
ArmInfo. Artak Beglaryan, head of the Artsakh Union NNGO and former NKR Ombudsman, presented the results of the Armenian authorities' policy in ensuring the rights of the Artsakh people during a parliamentary hearing on the draft law "On the National Crisis and Failure of Governance."
The head of the Union noted that it is precisely as a result of the ruling regime's actions that Artsakh is temporarily under Azerbaijani occupation. Regarding the current situation, he noted that it can be viewed in three ways.
Firstly, as Beglaryan noted, after the forced displacement, that people of Artsakh are not perceived as citizens by the authorities; moreover, they are denied their inherent right to return.
In this vein, the former NKR Ombudsman mentioned that this inherent right is essentially being denied by the ruling regime, despite the International Court of Justice ruling that the forcibly displaced population of Artsakh has the right to return. "Therefore, with this ruling, the Republic of Armenia has assumed an additional obligation to implement this right," the former Artsakh Ombudsman noted.
Beglaryan noted that in the negotiation process, it is not Azerbaijan, but Armenia, that should dictate its terms, demanding international security guarantees for return. However, as the head of the Artsakh Union NGO continued, the draft peace treaty does not contain a single clause regarding either ethnic cleansing or the right of return.
Secondly, the Armenian authorities have failed to resolve the humanitarian issues of the Artsakh people, as they have deprived the NKR population of financial assistance. This has resulted in poverty levels among the Artsakh population exceeding 80%. "And this is at a time when the average poverty rate in Armenia is around 23%," Beglaryan noted, adding that this has ultimately led to increased emigration.
This, as the head of the Artsakh Union noted, is a consequence of the failure of the Armenian government's programs, particularly in regards to housing and employment. Beglaryan also highlighted the issue of hate speech spread directed towards the Artsakh population. "When the people of Artsakh raised their voices to be heard, hate speech against them increased. However, neither the Investigative Committee nor the Prosecutor's Office did anything to stop such situations. Meanwhile, when representatives of the ruling party were affected, immediate action was taken," Beglaryan concluded.