ArmInfo. For the Armenian people, the jester and the king have merged into one, they are in one person. Political scientist, member of the "Alternative Projects Group" Vahe Hovhannisyan writes about this in his article.
According to him, warnings to the Armenian people about impending disasters come from everywhere: from Baku, Moscow, Ankara, Tehran, Minsk, Washington, Paris: People within the state concerned about the development of the situation also periodically splash out their emotions, but the situation does not change. "We need to correctly understand why we are in such a situation, why are we calmly waiting for Day X with a national pre-emigration mentality? And most importantly, what can be done to prevent a catastrophe?
At the root of our current crisis at the state and national levels are three factors that must be changed quickly: governance defects, underdeveloped institutions of resistance, and the sociology of defeat. For us, the jester and the king have merged into one. And this is an extremely serious challenge. In royal palaces, these are usually different characters, but in the history of nations, there are rare deviations that always lead to disastrous consequences. The clown is allowed to say many dangerous things, sometimes true, but he says them without having the leverage to make them believe. The king listens, forcing others to listen not to what he says with his own lips, but he has the leverage to be cold-blooded and rational. When a tragic coincidence occurs, the clown says a lot of stupid things that people do not take seriously, and the royal half, having the leverage, implements them, bringing disasters to their own people," the political scientist notes.
According to him, as a king, this person brings disasters, but as a jester, he ensures that people go towards troubles carefree and in a good mood.
"This is a serious problem that we need to solve. Has there been a rebellion in the ruling team after the latest statements? No. Has the number of those making "worthy" statements decreased? No. Has the public elite offered clear solutions? No. Has an atmosphere of total rejection formed? No. Are the streets filled with indignant people? No. The reason for all this is the inferiority and weakness of the institutions of resistance," the political scientist concluded.