ArmInfo. Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan destroyed the Artsakh negotiation package received in 2018, both in content and format. This was reported in a statement by Armen Ashotyan, Deputy Chairman of the Republican Party of Armenia.
As Ashotyan noted, Pashinyan tried to blame the loss of Artsakh on former presidents, faced with a 30-year negotiation process. In this regard, he recalled that the Artsakh "baton" was passed to the third President of Armenia Serzh Sargsyan and Foreign Minister Edward Nalbandian from the previous negotiators - the second President Robert Kocharyan and Foreign Minister Vardan Oskanyan - in the form of the Madrid principles presented by the OSCE Minsk Group Co-Chairs in November 2007.
"During the decade of Serzh Sargsyan's tenure in power, the negotiation document based on these principles took the form of the Kazan Document (June 2011), and the ideas and proposals that appeared later became working approaches in the non-paper format (unofficial document - ed.)," Ashotyan wrote.
Furthermore, according to the RPA Deputy Chairman, since 2008 the negotiation process has received new impetus thanks to numerous high-level bilateral, trilateral and multilateral meetings. However, three factors have created additional challenges for Armenian diplomacy. In particular, this was due to the increased external pressure on Armenia after the tragic events of March 1, 2008 (the death of 10 citizens and 2 police officers as a result of clashes at rallies - ed.). The constant increase in geopolitical tensions, which entered a new phase between the superpowers, also had an impact: the Munich speech of the Russian President in 2007, the Russian-Georgian war of 2008 and the international situation caused by the issues of Crimea and Donbass in 2014, as well as the Russian operation in Syria since 2015. In addition, the petrodollar "doping" from Azerbaijan's energy projects and the sharp increase in military spending played a role.
"Under these conditions, Armenian diplomacy managed not only to maintain its "red" lines, but also, on the basis of the Madrid proposal for a settlement that appeared at the end of 2007, to achieve the most favorable option for Armenia, approved by the international community and protected by it. The details of this option have been repeatedly voiced by the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairing countries themselves. At the same time, Pashinyan himself called the Kazan document the best. In the period from 2008 to 2018, Armenia not only resisted the diplomatic and military pressure of Azerbaijan, but also, thanks to our efforts and more than 30 changes and corrections, the "Madrid document" turned into fundamental principles (Basic principles) that have entered the international political and legal dictionary," Ashotyan continued.
In this vein, the RPA Deputy Chairman gave two examples illustrating the transformation and optimization of the negotiation process. According to him, between 2007 and 2018, the expression of the people's will, which became the basis for the realization of the right of the people of Nagorno-Karabakh to self- determination and the final determination of the region's status, received a legally binding formulation. At the same time, the temporary rights and privileges of the population of Artsakh proposed in the Madrid document were replaced by clearer formulations, such as the "temporary status of Nagorno-Karabakh" and related aspects.
In addition, as Ashotyan emphasized, even Azerbaijan was forced to agree to a negotiation process based on these approaches. This was confirmed by such documents as the Meiendorf Declaration of Russia, Armenia and Azerbaijan of November 2008, as well as the five-party statement of the heads of delegations of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chair countries together with Serzh Sargsyan and Ilham Aliyev at the OSCE summit in Astana in 2010.
"Moreover, these revised basic principles became the cornerstone of five trilateral statements signed by the presidents of Russia, the United States and France in 2009-2013, as well as ten joint statements at the OSCE Foreign Ministers' Summits. They formed the basis of the relevant provisions of the Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement between Armenia and the EU, as well as dozens of international reports and resolutions. Despite disagreements during the negotiations, the three previous presidents of Armenia were united by a common negotiating format - the OSCE Minsk Group," the RPA deputy chairman summed up.