Srbazan: Signing the border demarcation regulation goes against our  national interests and international standards

ArmInfo.The signing of the delimitation and demarcation commissions' regulations is a step that goes against our national interests and international standards.   Archbishop Bagrat Galstanyan (Srbazan), the leader of the Tavush for  the Motherland movement, stated thia at a protest rally in front of  the presidential residence on August 25, commenting on the  ratification of the document by the National Assembly and its signing  by the President of Armenia.

According to Srbazan, this regulation does not serve Armenia's  interests  and is in violation of the law. He also pointed out that  no country in the world defines its borders with such precision as  the current Prime Minister of Armenia does, noting that the latter  refers to Armenia's territory of 29,743 sq. km. "The border of  Armenia, like that of any state, is determined by where its military  is stationed," the leader of the movement added.

At the same time, Srbazan emphasized that, despite not being  recognized as an international document, the regulations had been  reviewed by the Constitutional Court, ratified by the National  Assembly and signed by the presidents of the two countries. He  explained that the haste in signing the regulations raises suspicions  and he considers the events in Kirants and Voskepar to be evidence of  state crimes. In this regard, he emphasized that not a single  institution in the country operates in accordance with the law or  moral standards.

Speaking about the passivity of the movement he leads, Srbazan noted  that it is not related to the current geopolitical processes,  particularly the elections taking place in Georgia. At the same time,  he is confident that the movement has just as many supporters as  claimed. "Our supporters are everywhere. As soon as they are needed,  they will be here," Srbazan noted.  The leader of the movement also  stated that he does not consider the sacred struggle's mission to  have failed. According to him, the stage they had to go through,  which is the removal of Nikol Pashinyan from power, has not yet  occurred. However, this does not mean that it cannot be achieved in  the future.