ArmInfo. The relatively modest amounts of "support" announced in Brussels should not be misleading. A similar opinion was expressed by political observer, expert of the Foundation for Strategic Culture (FSC), member of the Club of Friends of the Gorchakov Foundation Andrey Areshev in his article on FSC.
The expert recalled that on April 5, in Brussels, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan met with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Josep Borrell. At the same time, he stated that the fact that preparations for the meeting were being conducted behind closed doors was more than compensated by various leaks and hints at some grandiose decisions designed to contribute to a radical revision of the foreign policy course of the 'small' Caucasian country and its hastened "turn to the West."
Areshev also notes that the Western participants in the Brussels meeting 'called Absheron in advance' in order to once again assure that negotiations with Pashinyan were in no way directed against the Caspian country and its interests. Considering Washington and Brussels' close ties with Baku in the energy sector and beyond, as well as the support provided by Azerbaijan to the Zelensky regime, there is hardly any serious reason to doubt this.
"Striving to form a homogeneous geopolitical space on the territory of the former Soviet Transcaucasus, Western players are working equally closely with Tbilisi, Baku and Yerevan, based on current circumstances. The intensity of work in the Armenian direction is conditioned by Armenia's "frozen" membership in the CSTO and Russia's continued military presence, border guard's presence (they will leave Zvartnots airport in August), an and most importantly, with mutually beneficial trade and economic ties, the collapse of which, apparently, will be the main bet. Since March 30, cards of the Russian "Mir" payment system have stopped working in almost all banks of Armenia, with the exception of VTB Bank (Armenia), about which the payment system of Armenia Card (ArCa) notified the Russian "Mir" card operator in advance. Meanwhile, in early May, Nikol Pashinyan should take over the chairmanship of the EAEU in Moscow during the anniversary summit of the Union and, obviously, fill it with at least some meaning," the political scientist noted.
The expert also recalled that before the start of the negotiations, Pashinyan described the political cooperation of the parties as effective, at the same time, noting the need to develop economic cooperation, trade and mobility of citizens. In turn, Blinken announced another tranche of more than USD 65 million, more than 50% higher than similar receipts provided 2 years ago. Particular attention is paid to cessation of Russian-Armenian ties in nuclear energy, another evidence of which was Pashinyan's participation in the recent international nuclear energy summit in Brussels.
"Europe also plans to invest 270 million euros in grant support in the development of Armenia over the next 4 years. The EU is ready to invest in large regional infrastructure projects, green energy and is going to provide technical support to the state apparatus. Frau von der Leyen did not forget to welcome the "Crossroads of Peace" initiative proposed by the Prime Minister of Armenia. The further distancing of Armenia from Russia due to the threat of secondary sanctions did not go unnoticed: "We also welcome measures against circumvention of our sanctions against Russia to ensure that lethal weapons and equipment don't get to the hands of the Russian armed forces." Finally, according to the head of the European Commission, 30 million euros have been allocated since September 2023 and several more will be allocated for the integration and support of forcibly displaced persons from Nagorno-Karabakh (many of whom, most likely, have already left Armenia) ", Areshev stated.
"To the great disappointment of supporters of European integration, there was no mention of the coveted "visa-free travel" recommended by the "Network of Friends of Armenia" of former NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen in a special report published on the eve of the Brussels meeting. In addition to standard measures on economic support for Yerevan, the development of healthcare, the rule of law, compliance human rights and democracy, it was also recommended to subsidize the import of basic food products to Armenia, support the development of the Armenian economy and invite it to become a member of the European Energy Community, help in the transition to green energy and diversification of its sources," the expert noted, noting that the amount, which Washington and Brussels plan to allocate to Armenia, is significantly lower than the expectations circulating on the eve of the meeting (the Armenian government was counting on financial support in the amount of $1 billion in the form of direct budget investments for the next 4 years, including providing housing for former residents of Nagorno-Karabakh ).
Areshev also does not rule out that "behind the scenes" in Brussels there were more generous promises, but completely divorced from reality, as has repeatedly happened in the history of the Armenian people and in the contacts of its national leaders with the sharks of imperialist diplomacy, at least since the Berlin Congress of 1878 - of course, adjusted for modern realities.
"The movement <to the West> in the early 1990s at the dawn of the "Third Republic" under the first president Levon Ter-Petrosyan meant, not least of all, a compromise with Azerbaijan and rapprochement with Turkey, which was replaced by a blind blockade by the latter in April 1993 after the Nagorno Karabakh conflict was withdrawn from the administrative borders of the former Soviet autonomy (Kelbajar operation of the Armenian forces)."Europeanization" during the time of the third president, dubious constitutional reform of 2013-2015, but mainly the "velvet revolution" of 6 years ago, torpedoing the negotiation process on Karabakh under the auspices of the OSCE Minsk Group, the "planned defeat" in the "44-day war" of 2020 and the transfer of the remaining Armenian part of the region to the control of Baku in September 2023 - all this, in particular, determined not only a visible foreign policy turn of the current Armenian government, but also further lines of socio-political division, affecting, among other things, the Diaspora," Areshev is sure.
At the same time, the political scientist noted that recently, in the publications and Internet broadcasts of pro-government propagandists, notes of hostility towards Russian Armenians are increasingly creeping in. Just as the arrows were pointed at the "former authorities" and to the "Karabakh clan", responsibility for the conscious surrender of the region in 2020-2023 is shifted to Russia, which is a blatant manipulation of public opinion and distortion of real facts.
"There is no doubt that this line will be continued further, just as Ukrainian society was fragmented along the path of movement "to Europe": as they say, there is no other option. There is no doubt that a significant part of Western money will be directed to staffing the corresponding well-selected personnel in the information, educational and cultural-humanitarian spheres, including the introduction of newfangled ideological narratives, among which is the idea of Russians as eternal enemies, whose "imperialist" conquests have destroyed almost the idyll in the relations of Armenians with neighboring peoples...", - says the Russian political scientist.
At the same time, Areshev drew attention to the fact that the volumes of grant support announced in Brussels cannot be compared with the multibillion-dollar benefits received by Armenia from interaction with Moscow and within the framework of the EAEU and the CIS, which has ensured a four-fold increase in trade turnover over the past 6 years and, as a result, record economic growth and increased well-being of the population.
"However, as the experience of many post-Soviet countries testifies, mundane mercantile calculations often give in to properly promoted ideological chimeras. On the same day, at the Armenian Embassy in Belgium, Pashinyan met with the head of USAID, banned in Russia, Samantha Power, and today, April 8, in Yerevan Secretary General of the Council of Europe Marija Pejcinovic Buric is coming, while the working trip of the Special Envoy of the President of the Russian Federation for the South Caucasus, Igor Khovaev, has been coordinated for more than six months," Areshev summed up.