ArmInfo.The US-EU-Armenia meeting is evidence the sides are drawing closer to one another, EU Foreign Policy Spokesperson Peter Stano told RFE/RL.
Commenting on the statement by Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan that Armenia is ready to be as close to the EU as the European Union deems possible, Stano stated that the nature of relations between two partners always depends on their ambitions. So, of course, it does not just depend on Brussels or just on Yerevan. It depends on where the sides want to be together and how far they want to go in terms of strengthening their cooperation. The US-EU-Armenia trilateral meeting held in Brussels proves that the sides are becoming closer to each other. And this is based on common determination, he said.
When asked to clarify in what direction bilateral relations will develop - within the framework of the already existing Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership or whether there is a possibility of granting Armenia candidate status to the EU, Stano explained that in interaction the emphasis is on the existing foundations. However, he added, there is also progress on the new partnership agenda, which was agreed two months ago and reaffirmed in Brussels.
According to him, at a meeting in Brussels on April 5, areas of interaction were determined, since there is a common understanding and desire to take existing relations to a new, higher level due to the desire to cooperate on broader issues and in more areas.
Touching upon the issue of security and clarifying why the EU is in no hurry to include Armenia in the list of countries using the Peace Mechanism, despite the fact that this was announced back in the fall of 2023, Stano recalled that this issue is decided by the member states, since this is about security policy. This is an area under the strict control of all member states, and any decision there can only be taken with the consent of all members of the European Union. But they are working on it. Discussions about supporting the European Peace Fund are ongoing, and at some point a decision will be made But the processes in the EU take some time, especially considering that there must be consensus among all 27 member states, the European official said.
When asked to clarify what caused the delays in the process of starting a dialogue between Armenia and the EU on visa liberalization, Stano stated that there are no delays, since there is no schedule for the start of this process.
Visa liberalization is similar to other EU processes. It is a very thorough, highly technical process, ultimately also political, since the decision must be approved by all member states. That is the answer to your question, why is it taking so long? Because member states must find the best a way to ensure that they are satisfied with all the criteria that have been met, that they have sufficient guarantees that visa liberalization will not be abused, etc. There are technical, security and other considerations that Member States take into account when adopting decisions. They have to make a decision. But the EU has stated that visa liberalization, along with support from the European Peace Fund, are areas in which the EU wants to discuss in more detail the possibilities of achieving practical results. So there is a willingness, he added.
When asked whether the European Union can help restore the territorial integrity of Armenia and whether there is such a readiness in Brussels, Stano recalled that international law exists for this. "And the European Union has a very clear approach: international law must be respected, it cannot be violated. And if there are problems, they must be resolved at the negotiating table. That is why the EU are actively involved in supporting the negotiation process between Azerbaijan and Armenia to resolve all existing problems. In this The President of the European Council, Charles Michel, is actively involved, with the support of High Representative Borrell, EU Special Representative Toivo Klaar. This is what the EU is already doing, working with both sides in bilateral and trilateral formats to advance this process. But, in the end, Azerbaijan and Armenia must find a solution yourself. No one can solve the problem for you. No one can force solutions on you. All of us, the international community, can only help, Mr Stano said.
To the remark that Azerbaijan violated the agreements reached through the mediation of Charles Michel, and whether the EU has mechanisms of influence for refusing to fulfill its obligations, Stano assured that the European Union cannot take on the role of an arbiter.
The EU cannot take the main role in the settlement process, but it can play a supporting role with other partners, the US, the UN, if Armenia wants, because this is about compliance with international law. The EU do not use leverage or coercion to force anyone then do something, and offer our services, our best practices and our good intentions to help the parties find a solution," he said, adding that the EU adheres to this principle in all parts of the world.
The EU is not in the business of imposing anything on countries and partners. The EU emphasizes the need to respect international law. The EU emphasizes the need for reconciliation and good neighborliness, as these are the principles of civilized life. In the EU, we live in the 21st century, and in the 21st century, issues are resolved through discussion, and not by force, Mr Stano said.
To clarify whether anyone who violates this international law should not be held accountable, Stano noted that for such cases there is the UN, the UN Security Council, and any country has the right to address this issue to the Security Council, the International Court of Justice, the International Criminal Court .
This is the existing system that we want to strengthen. The EU must ensure compliance with international law, and part of its implementation is the settlement process, the negotiation process. Negotiations are ongoing between Armenia and Azerbaijan, the settlement process is underway, regardless of the incidents you mentioned that occurred and, to unfortunately, can happen. But this once again underlines why everyone must do everything possible to find solutions. Because, in the end, it is not the EU that suffers, Mr Stano said.