ArmInfo. De-Armenianization of Artsakh was an international conspiracy the forces involved tried to put into practice using various scenarios, believes political expert Stepan Dalielyan.
He recalled that days earlier, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said that the residents of Gaza would die on their land, but would not leave their homeland like the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh.
"What does what was said mean and to whom is it addressed? Many people think that it is directed against the Armenians or that he is trying to humiliate the Armenians with these words. I am sure that these words are not addressed to us and it is very important to understand who they are addressed to and what they mean. This is important to understand for awareness of what happened in Artsakh and Armenia, and understanding of what is happening now," the expert noted, expressing the belief that the de- Armenianization of Artsakh was a conspiracy of international actors.
"Russia needed the Armenians to make some concessions and Russian troops to be sent there for as long a period as possible so that Artsakh remained a bone of contention, ensuring Russia's long-term presence in the Caucasus. Given the weakening of Russia, they wanted to make concessions in this way.
However, the conditional West needed something completely different. The conditional West needed the final de- Armenianization of Artsakh so that Russia would leave the region, and an Azerbaijani "Gaza" would be created in the north of Iran, which would constantly threaten the existence of Iran, for which the current regime was brought to power in Armenia, which had been conducting propaganda for many years liberation from Artsakh," the political scientist stated.
At the same time, Danielyan is convinced that Israel was one of the main beneficiaries of the programs of the conditional West, for which the de- Armenianization of Artsakh also became a precedent for repeating the same scenario in the Gaza Strip.
"We will not dwell here on the role of Gaza, which not only posed a constant threat to the existence of Israel, but also had important geopolitical significance for the construction of possible future communications. By the way, the importance of Artsakh, and then Syunik, is comparable to Gaza.
"What did Erdogan say? He stated that the geopolitical center that developed such a plan would not be able to implement it successfully in the Gaza Strip following the example of Artsakh. Life will tell whether this will succeed or not, but Erdogan's words were addressed precisely to these forces," the expert said.
READ ALL COMMENTS