ArmInfo. There is no feeling that it is possible to get out of zugzwang peacefully, since there are points of disagreement between the positions of Armenia and Azerbaijan, even in the situation that has developed after the completely peaceful statement of Nikol Pashinyan.
Arkady Dubnov, an independent political scientist, an expert on the CIS countries and Central Asia, announced this to the Spektr publication the other day. According to him, the estalishment of the checkpoint blocking Artsakh was provoked, among other things, by the words of the Prime Minister of Armenia himself. In his speech, there was no mention of the fate of Karabakh, the restoration of some kind of peace within the proposed scenario between Azerbaijan and Armenia. When Pashinyan said that we were ready to return to the 1991 borders, this meant that Karabakh would not be part of Armenia, since in 1991 Nagorno-Karabakh was part of the Azerbaijan SSR. Thus, Pashinyan, by tacit agreement, left comments on the fate of Karabakh to Aliyev himself. He accepted it in such a way that Yerevan gives up its positions and its claims to consider Nagorno Karabakh as Armenian. In this regard, Aliyev behaved brutally: "Are you giving up Artsakh? Well, then it's ours. We do whatever we want there.> He stressed that there is no question of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh: "Karabakh is Azerbaijan." By the way, he urged Pashinyan to repeat this phrase.
If you look at everything from this point of view then, according to Dubnov, in fact, the behavior of Azerbaijan, which is very defiant and provocative, lies in the logic of preparations for the mutual recognition of the 1991 borders.
According to Dubnov, for Yerevan, the problem of the security of Armenia itself, its existence as a state, first of all, lies in an attempt to provide guarantees for the country from expansion by Azerbaijan. "This is the main thing, in my opinion, in the content of Pashinyan's policy, as the authorities who see this reconciliation agreement with Azerbaijan as an opportunity to get such guarantees. Despite the fact that the issue of the status of Nagorno-Karabakh by tacit agreement of Pashinyan is decided in favor of Azerbaijan>, the political scientist noted. In other words, he noted, Artsakh ceases to be at the center of the "Armenian world" paradigm, the main point of which was the existence of two Armenian states.
Speaking about how the citizens of Armenia would react to such a turn in the country's foreign policy, Dubnov stressed that different options are possible, but recent years give reason to believe that, despite the noisy opposition in Armenia, Pashinyan should not be afraid of some kind of mass street protests. <The opposition does not have a coherent and viable program of action opposed to Pashinyan's policy. Therefore, I think that now everything will be decided depending on how Baku behaves, which is under pressure, on the one hand, from Russia, which is hoped for in Armenia, and under the pressure of the Western community, which today expresses, of course, an active support to Yerevan and demands from Azerbaijan to liquidate the checkpoint>, the expert noted.
But, according to him, Baku perceives this rhetoric quite cynically, realizing that the outside world has no opportunity to support Armenia. First of all, by military means. It will have to deal directly with Azerbaijan, which is ready to solve this problem again by force. This is a huge drama and tragedy of today's Armenia.
At the same time, the expert believes that Azerbaijan cannot afford open aggression against Armenia. Although already today some parts of the territory of Armenia are occupied by Azerbaijan. "Russia did not react to this in any way. As we know, it was the refusal of Russia and the CSTO to give a political assessment of the annexation of part of the territories of Armenia by Azerbaijan in September 2022 that caused a very critical reconfiguration of the entire Armenian policy not in favor of Russia and the CSTO. If something like this happens again on a larger scale, it could lead to a deep crisis in the South Caucasus. And anyway, I don't think that in such a scenario Russia will help Armenia by military means, unfortunately> Dubnov said.
At the same time, he noted that any attempt to find a peace agreement between Baku and Yerevan in Washington and in the West in general without the participation of Moscow would be accepted in the Kremlin with great irritation: "I do not rule out that in one way or another Moscow will try to neutralize this kind of meeting, if not to interfere with it at all. It will be a very serious defeat for Moscow if the peace is signed on the terms put forward by the Americans."
Speaking about Russia's tools that it could use to influence the situation in the region, Dubnov stressed that the peacekeepers can do nothing but fix the violation associated with the establishment of the same checkpoint. "They cannot enter into a military confrontation with the Azerbaijanis. The peacekeepers are only able to report violations to Moscow, bring to the attention of the Azerbaijani side that they fix what is happening as a violation, and call for its elimination. Apparently, the mandate that the Russian peacekeepers have does not apply for a larger mandate>, the political scientist noted. He also noted that the President of Azerbaijan in his last speech on television sent a very sharp message to the Russian peacekeepers without mentioning them. Aliyev said that Baku will not allow anyone to take control of "its land". It clearly refers to the presence of Russian peacekeepers in Karabakh. At the same time, as Dubnov noted, Moscow persistently and consistently avoids any aggravation of relations with Azerbaijan, which is important for Russia as a regional power to maintain its position in the South Caucasus from the point of view of geopolitics. The tandem of Baku and Ankara is becoming the most important factor in Europe's energy security. If Russia loses loyal relations with Azerbaijan, it will lose its influence on Europe even more than today.