ArmInfo. Armenia has not recognized Nagorno-Karabakh's independence either, Russian Ambassador to Armenia Sergey Kopyrkin said in an interview with the Public TV of Armenia in response to the moderator's question as to why Moscow has not so far recognize Nagorno-Karabakh's independence, whereas it has recognized the Donetsk People's Republic, Luhansk People's Republic, Abkhazia and South Ossetia.
Mr Kopyrkin noted that the Karabakh problem has been dealt with for a very long period, and Russia has not changed its position
"The problem must be solved with all the parties' interests considered. And we have been doing our best to create conditions to find a solution. As regards South Ossetia and Abkhazia, we know very well that Russia did not at first recognize them as independent states. And it was only after Tbilisi's aggression against South Ossetia and strikes against Russian peacekeepers that necessary steps were taken," the Russian ambassador said.
Asked if Russian peacekeepers will remain in Artsakh in four years, Kopyrkin found it difficult to make forecasts. He recalled relevant agreements, which can be extended.
"It depends on further developments and on the parties' positions, including a most important factor, namely, the Armenian population's feeling of security due to Russian peacekeepers," the diplomat said.
Speaking of Armenian-Russian relations, Ambassador Kopyrkin stated they are a strategic alliance. Both the sides are showing a political will to strengthen and develop them.
"Evidence thereof is a number of factors, including active development of economic ties, which are acquiring new forms now. Among them are last year's visits by representative Russian business delegations, new investment projects on the agenda. All of our ties remain high on the agenda. We remain politico-military allies, which is a most important field of our cooperation," Mr Kopyrkin said, and singled out cooperation within the CSTO and EAEU.
As regards the international assessments of Russia's actions in Ukraine, which are viewed as an aggression, Mr Kopyrkin put a counter-question as to which world is calling Russia's special operation in Ukraine an "aggression." "It is the West! Fortunately, it is not the entire world and even is not a larger part of the world. Another question is that these leading nations, with their information resources and greater potential, are forcing their views on a large number of people worldwide. But we can by no means speak of the entire world, and I think many countries disagree with such wording," the Russian diplomat said. He disagrees with the opinion that Russia attacked Ukraine. Mr Kopyrkin points out a need for identifying the root cause, which Russian President Vladimir Putin had spoken of earlier. In this context, the Russian diplomat recalled NATO's promises not to expand eastward. In fact, however, NATO's 2-step expansion has brought it close to Russia's borders. In this context, Ambassador Kopyrkin singled out Ukraine's special role in NATO's tasks to check Russia. He recalled the West's efforts to alienate Ukraine from Russia.
"Russia has always respected Ukraine's choice an has been interested in maintaining our bilateral ties. We have never made Ukraine face the choice: we or the West. Rather, our policy has been establishing mutually beneficial and comprehensive ties with the West," Mr Kopyrkin said. Russia has spared no effort to settle the issues with Ukraine, but has not been shown understanding. The Russian diplomat spoke of the growing anti-Russian and neo-Nazi sentiments in Ukraine and of Ukraine's military buildup, including with the West's support, talks about Ukraine's accession to NATO and, finally, sabotaging the Minsk agreements.
Commenting on the talks about Russia's intention to restore the Soviet Union, Ambassador Kopyrkin expressed confidence that "to processes are deliberately being mixed. Yes, Russia is interested in intensifying Eurasia integration, primarily with our closest neighbors, the ones we have much in common with. And Ukraine is evidence that these ties are objective and have not been lost. They can be a factor of security and prosperity, which we are actually seeking to ensure within the Eurasian Economic Union. On the other hand, they can be a factor that would have disastrous consequences, when it comes to severing relations and anti-Russian sentiments," he said. Ukraine is a good example, he added.
Calling for being realists, the Russian diplomat stated that the EAEU member-states cannot be said to be losing their sovereignty. According to him, Armenia's leaders can confirm this. "Any dictatorship or losing sovereign rights is out of the question. Moreover, developing the ties is a most important factor and means of strengthening the countries' sovereignty," Kopyrkin said.
Asked about the results of the military operation in Ukraine, he said that it is, as has been stated, demilitarization and denazification.