ArmInfo. Tensions between Russia and the West have resulted in the possibility of complementarity being sharply narrowed or non-existent. Second President of Armenia Robert Kocharian stated this at a press conference on December 27.
He recalled that during his presidency, a policy of complementarity was proclaimed, but then in the Russia- NATO relations Russia had more plans with NATO than Armenia.
"There was a special Russia-NATO council. This means that we must more clearly define what we want. I still do not understand the logic and direction of our foreign policy. A very simple example: the United States is organizing a so-called democratic conference. Obviously, this is an anti-Russian and anti-Chinese initiative. What are we going to do there? For the sake of some 3-minute empty speech, we entered a format directed against a strategic ally that ensures the security of our borders, why are we participating in an event against this country? I have no explanation, "Kocharian noted, expressing his conviction that this is an attempt to revive a trend that had a rather powerful potential after the collapse of the USSR.
According to the second President of the Republic of Armenia, then the idea was that by democratizing the whole world, it would be possible to make it more predictable and secure.
"But then there were color revolutions with catastrophic consequences, there was the Arab spring, there was an invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan also with the consequences of a natural disaster, there was the torture of Guantanamo. This myth is no longer believed. Now, putting all this aside, we cheerfully entered the process in order to get "present", Kocharian noted, while expressing the conviction that if the confrontation in West-Russia relations intensifies and gets extreme manifestations, Armenia Armenia may get in the middle of it, unless we have a strong army and a solid security system.
Kocharian believes that the goal of the West is to withdraw Russia from this region, or at least significantly reduce their influence in this region.
To clarify whether this means that the vector of foreign policy should be directed exclusively towards the Russian Federation, Kocharian about the advisability of participating in an event that has a frankly anti- Russian orientation.
"There are many other formats where the anti-Russian orientation is not emphasized. You cannot jump headlong into a carriage that goes in a different direction. This has nothing to do with your participation in the CSTO, the EAEU. Decide where you are. Of course, a balance must be maintained, but do those people who must maintain this balance understand what a balance is?", he summed up.