ArmInfo. "In my speeches, interviews and publications, I have repeatedly expressed the idea that" the key to solving the Karabakh problem is in the hands of Russia, " which was perceived with bewilderment or anger by political forces, experts and the current government." This is stated in the article of the first President of Armenia Levon Ter-Petrosyan, published on ilur.am.
At the same time, he added that given the urgency of the issue, he considers it not superfluous to recall the positions he expressed on this issue at the time. At the same time, the first president apologized to readers for the vastness of these excerpts. "Unlike the West, Transcaucasia has been and remains a sphere of vital interests for Russia, and it is naive to believe that it will ever abandon the path of protecting these interests. The above-mentioned passivity of the West is partly due to the fact that it, at least subconsciously, considers the region as a zone of influence of Russia. If not the United States, then at least many EU countries have somehow come to terms with this idea and are clearly not going to actively interfere in the affairs of the Caucasus. This means that the key to the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, and why not the Armenian-Turkish relations, is in the hands of Russia.
Therefore, regardless of their preferences, any Armenian government should seek a solution to these vital problems in this geopolitical context. This behavior is not related to desires or orientations, but only to the awareness of reality and the imperative of political realism. The Armenian authorities, in my opinion, do not realize this yet. Meanwhile, Turkey and Azerbaijan, obviously, more correctly assess the reality, as evidenced by the recent active contacts of these countries with Russia. According to this, we found ourselves in the same situation as in 1920, from which, unfortunately, at the time we did not find the right way out. We have no right to repeat the same mistake today >(Speech at the XVI Congress of the Armenian National Movement, July 17, 2010).
"Afghanistan, Israel, Iran and the economic crisis are such a heavy burden for the West, which leaves no room for thinking about Karabakh and Transcaucasia as a whole. ...Unlike the West, for Russia, the Transcaucasus was and remains a sphere of vital interests, and it is naive to believe that it will ever abandon the path of protecting these interests. ... This means that the key to the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, and why not the Armenian-Turkish relations, is in the hands of Russia. Therefore, regardless of their preferences, any Armenian government should seek a solution to these vital problems in this geopolitical context. Undoubtedly, the extension of the deployment of the Russian military base in Armenia and the deal on the sale of S-300 complexes to Azerbaijan are even more important.
They will strengthen Russia's position in the Transcaucasus and infinitely increase its role in the Karabakh settlement process. In the light of these recent events, it is clear that no matter how much Russia agrees with the principles and programs developed by the Minsk Group, it will not allow the deployment of international peacekeeping forces in the conflict zone, and certainly will not tolerate any NATO presence in the Transcaucasus. These statements cannot be considered an expression of a pro-Russian or anti-Western position, as some have perceived or tried to imagine, but only a simple statement of reality, not related to anyone's desire or political orientation. Unfortunately, according to the information I have, the Armenian authorities, instead of drawing the right conclusions from this reality, are trying to extract short-term benefits and link everything to orientations.
I cannot fail to mention the following significant event that took place in Baku two weeks ago and did not attract the attention of political scientists. I am referring to the unequivocal statement of Presidents Medvedev and Aliyev that Russia and Azerbaijan are now strategic partners. Although such words have been said before, the specific content is being put into them for the first time. In other words, what I predicted in my speech at the meeting of the RA Security Council on January 8, 1998, has come true, noting in particular the following: "I do not exclude, but on the contrary, I consider it quite natural and probable that, given the problems of Caspian oil production and the construction of oil pipelines, Russia will soon make serious efforts to establish normal relations with Azerbaijan, and in this case Armenia will lose its only advantage as an ally or strategic partner of Russia in the Transcaucasus"(LTP, selected Article 658).
I think it is not difficult to imagine the consequences of the strategic partnership between Russia and Azerbaijan for Armenia and Karabakh. Thus, there are all signs that the formation of a new Russian-Turkish-Azerbaijani format in the process of the Karabakh settlement is becoming a fact. This, of course, does not mean that it will replace the Minsk Group, which, in my opinion, will continue to exist, if only to create the appearance of a combination of international efforts and not to irritate the West. Meanwhile, the real processes will take place in a new format, which in the previous speech gave me the basis for comparing the current situation with the situation in 1920... The attention of the entire Armenian people in this alarming situation should be focused on the dangers facing Karabakh and Armenia, because, as in 1920, we face the threat of forced solutions"(Speech at the rally on September 17, 2010). "The settlement of the Karabakh conflict, which Armenia can achieve at the cost of maximum efforts at the present time, could have been achieved in 1998 on much more favorable terms. If this had happened, we would not only have avoided the unnecessary suffering and losses of the last eighteen years, but today we would have a completely different, prosperous, populous, developing country and a secure Karabakh.
It is a pity that these simple truths were not understood by some of my colleagues at the time, and we missed the most appropriate moment to resolve the issue. I hope that you will take this statement not as a reproach to some, but as a warning that if we lose time again, we will have to deal with the issue in worse conditions and from a much weaker position. The reason for the devastating consequences of the change of power in 1998 should not be found in the change of actors, but in the violation of the continuity of policy. Leaving aside the past, it is clear that today we are once again faced with the urgent need not to miss a single moment in the settlement of the Karabakh conflict, as evidenced, in particular, by the recent serious efforts made by Russia in this direction. I once said that the key to solving the Karabakh problem is in the hands of Russia, and its efforts now confirm the truth of this statement.
Moreover, the West, which, as already mentioned, does not have the Karabakh settlement among its priorities, is certainly not only aware of, but also appreciates, Russia's special role in this issue. The Armenian National Congress, like its predecessor, the Armenian National Movement, is the only party in Armenia that has not only never concealed, but has repeatedly publicly declared its commitment to compromise and peace. Therefore, not only from a principled point of view, but also from the point of view of the situation, the Congress should participate in the upcoming parliamentary elections with a constructive program in order to put an end to the arms race, exclude a new war, resolve the Karabakh issue and normalize relations with Turkey from the vital interests of the people. This program, of course, is only possible if the Congress wins the elections or if it has a respectable presence in the National Assembly" (Speech at the Congress of the Armenian National Congress, 17.12.2016). At the same time, at the end of the publication, Ter-Petrosyan considered it useful to quote an excerpt from a voluminous article by the former co - chair of the OSCE Minsk Group from the United States, Richard Hoagland, published recently as an example of the truthfulness of his point of view.
"When the so-called "Lavrov plan" was published, I asked my colleague, the Russian co-chair, Ambassador Popov, whether the Kremlin would actually implement it if Yerevan and Baku accepted it. He answered honestly: "Of course not." Then it became clear to me that Nagorno-Karabakh is not a bilateral issue between Armenia and Azerbaijan, in fact, it is a trilateral issue in which Russia plays a key, if not a decisive role," Hoagland wrote. "In my opinion, one of the main reasons for the tragedy that happened to us in the Artsakh issue was the ignorance or disregard of this reality by the two previous and current authorities. If this were just a statement of historical reality, I would not consider it necessary to dwell on it again.
Unfortunately, even today, almost all political circles and state bodies, in particular members of the government, especially the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, make clear statements about the hope of resolving the Karabakh issue again within the framework of the Minsk Group. This trend is fraught with new disappointments, if not big losses, " Ter-Petrosyan concluded.