ArmInfo.Russia has always played an important role in the settlement of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. President of Azerbaijan Ilham Aliyev stated this in an interview with TASS.
Thus, clarifying whether he is ready to come to Moscow to meet with his counterpart with the mediation of the Russian Federation, Aliyev said that he had been to Moscow many times. However, the Azerbaijani leader continued, in this case he did not receive such an invitation. He also stated that many times Russian President Vladimir Putin personally and Dmitry Medvedev before him held trilateral meetings between the leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan.
"Russia has always played an important role in the settlement of the conflict, I spoke about this. There are objective reasons for this - both historical and geographical. As well as the reasons that Russia has been actively operating in our region for many decades and there is a high level of interaction. Therefore, we are ready for any contacts, "Aliyev said, assuring that when the proposal to organize a meeting of foreign ministers was received, Baku immediately agreed.
"We said:" Yes, we are ready. "And I said when I was talking with the President of Russia that I was sending the Minister. By the way, the Foreign Minister [of Azerbaijan] was at that time in Geneva, negotiating with the Minsk Group. During the high degree of escalation, our minister was in Geneva, and the Armenian minister never got there, although he should have been there too, "Aliyev said.
He also assured that Azerbaijan is committed to the obligations that they assume in the framework of contacts with their partners. "Both from the very beginning, and in the process of negotiations to resolve the conflict, we have always relied on international law and our commitment to resolving the conflict peacefully. We tried to fulfill the obligations that Azerbaijan assumed after the talks in Moscow," the Azerbaijani president said, as usual blaming the Armenian side for non-observance of the truce, and keeping silent about the unleashed aggression against Artsakh, and the breakdown of two truces.
According to him, the fact that the situation is still in a hot phase is not Azerbaijan's fault. "I have repeatedly said that Azerbaijan is committed to the principles of the settlement, which were developed by the long-term negotiation process. We are ready to suspend military actions even tomorrow if Armenia behaves" constructively "on the negotiating track. But the statements we hear from Yerevan completely contradict the basic principles that were developed by the OSCE Minsk Group, "the head of Azerbaijan said, declaring his readiness to suspend hostilities again and resolve the issue at the negotiating table. When asked whether Azerbaijan is ready for a meeting of the military, as Russia proposes to agree on verification mechanisms, Aliyev noted that in this case, the political will of the leaderships of Armenia and Azerbaijan is paramount, and the Azerbaijani side has such a will. "Not wishing to continue bloodshed and wanting to save people's lives, we are ready to resolve this issue politically. As for contacts between the military, these points are clearly defined in the basic principles. And we are committed to the basic principles that I have already mentioned. Therefore, the question that you have just asked is in the basic principles at the end of the agreement. Then, when all the issues related to de-occupation were settled, then the presence of foreign peacekeeping forces was supposed. But since the main issues requiring settlement were not agreed, the parties did not approach this issue. Therefore, there was no clear understanding of who these forces would consist of, which international structures, which countries would be represented there. All this was not discussed.
But one thing was clear that the composition of the peacekeeping forces should be agreed upon by Azerbaijan and Armenia, as well as the location of these forces. This has not been defined either. Therefore, today, when there is no line of contact, when the status quo has been violated and we have violated it, and we did this within the framework of repeated statements by the heads of state of Russia, the United States and France that the status quo is unacceptable. We heard these statements, but did not see their implementation. Therefore, we implemented it ourselves. That is, there is no status quo, no line of contact. And how can military observers technically be deployed, and where can they be deployed? Every day the situation on the battlefield changes. And in such a situation, will some foreign experts come there? And where will they stand? On some mountains, valleys, bridges? All this requires a lot of detailed study. This is a great risk for those who deem it necessary to send their military contingent there. And all this must be agreed - composition, mandate, terms, goals. And of course, all this should be within the framework of the basic principles, which, as I said, are accepted by us, and rejected by the Armenian side, "Aliyev said.
When asked whether Azerbaijan would agree to the introduction of Russian military observers into the region to ensure a truce and security guarantees, and if not Russian, then what other countries could participate in such a mission, Aliyev expressed confidence that this issue should be agreed within the framework of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmanship between Russia, France and the United States.
"After it is agreed upon, it should be presented to the parties. That is, it was all assumed in the basic principles. Because we will not determine who will be - peacekeepers or, as they now want to call them, observers. This will be a proposal with the co-chairs of the OSCE Minsk Group. Both Azerbaijan and Armenia, for their part, can either veto this or that country, or agree. Therefore, I do not think that unilaterally this would correspond to the spirit of cooperation between the three co-chair countries - to determine any military contingent. And most importantly - where? That is the question.
The point is not whether Azerbaijan agrees or disagrees. We need to know the mandate, who is the guarantor, functions, location, activity. Are they going to stand on the mountains or in an open field and watch who shoots where? First of all, it is dangerous. Secondly, in the case, say, as it is presented to us, in order to observe who broke the truce: even if it will be determined who broke the truce,- what's next? What, these people will be held accountable? Will there be any criminal cases? Therefore, it is necessary, first of all, to determine the procedure for the implementation of the basic principles, "the head of Azerbaijan said, while he stressed that only after the" de-occupation ", it will be possible to discuss the issue of observers.
He once again assured that there is no factual data on the transfer of mercenaries from the Middle East to Azerbaijan. And naturally he did not miss the opportunity to criticize the activities of the OSCE Minsk Group, noting that despite their efforts, they still did not achieve any result.
Aliyev also said that the previous Armenian authorities categorically refused the issue of transferring Kelbajar (Karvachar) with Lachin. "In other words, a mechanism was proposed that assumed that these areas would forever remain under Armenian control, which I categorically could not agree to," he said.
In his interview, Aliyev again voiced the theses and principles that run counter to the logic of the conflict settlement on the basis of mutual concessions, trying by threats to impose on the Armenian side a settlement concept convenient for Baku, without taking into account the interests of Artsakh and Armenia.