Tuesday, April 30 2019 15:27

ArmInfo. The decision of the ECHR in the case of Khudunts v.  Azerbaijan and Amraov v. Armenia is connected with material damage. On April 30, Artsakh Ombudsman Artak  Beglaryan stated this on April 30 during the parliamentary meeting of  the Human Rights Commission.

He noted that hundreds of lawsuits related to material damage were  sent to the ECHR from Artsakh and Azerbaijan. "It would seem that in  connection with these two cases, the ECHR has set itself a certain  threshold, below which it does not intend to go down in cases of this  kind. Such a decision gives us reason to believe that such claims  will be rejected, due to lack of evidence, or something However, it  should be emphasized that all this does not apply to the war crimes  that were recorded during the April war, crimes against humanity, and  against those crimes that concern the right to life, and the right to  be free from torture, " Beglaryan said.

The Ombudsman of Artsakh said that the decision on these two lawsuits  should not be confused with the crimes that occurred during the April  war. "Back in 2016, Artsakh Ombudsman Ruben Melikyan published a very  large-scale report in which violations of the Azerbaijani armed  forces against basic human rights are presented. The report notes  that these violations were permanent, as in 27 cases, out of 31  representatives of the Azerbaijani armed forces violated human rights  recorded in the European Convention, including cases of beheading and  torture.  -sh-

On 23 cases, the ECHR underwent quick discussions, and these issues  are now at the communication stage, "noted Beglaryan. We note that  the ECHR recently found the complaints on the Khudunts v. Azerbaijan  and Amraov v. Armenia cases unacceptable. Azerbaijani Amraov filed  The ECHR complained of demanding compensation for the material and  moral damage that the latter suffered during the events that took  place in 2016. The complaint notes that human rights were violated in  the European Convention on Human Rights, however, the ECHR considered  this complaint unacceptable and unacceptable. In the Khudunts v.  Azerbaijan case, the complaint was filed by Svetlana Khudunts, a  resident of Martakert, who complained that on the night of April 2  explosions were heard near the village of Talish, and in the morning  the residents were evacuated. On April 4, they returned home,  however, then shots again followed, and the residents were again  evacuated, many residents did not return to their homes for fear of  repeated attacks.