
ArmInfo.The Constitutional Court of Armenia must rule on the applications of opposition forces challenging the results of the latest parliamentary elections in Armenia by July 4. This was stated by Arman Dilanyan, Chairman of the Constitutional Court (CC) of Armenia, speaking to journalists in Yerevan on June 30 before the next court hearing.
He recalled that July 4 is the deadline for the court to publish its decision. "This is precisely why we are working so intensively, as the review must be completed by July 4. This is the deadline for publishing the decision," Dilanyan noted.
Speaking about the purpose of holding a closed court hearing today, the President of the Constitutional Court of Armenia explained that classified documents would be examined. "During one stage of this hearing, only classified documents will be considered, therefore, it will be held in a closed format. Only participants in the trial, that is, the applicants and the judges, will be present," Dilanyan noted.
He also responded to the opposition's claim that Constitutional Court Judge Seda Safaryan's questions at the Supreme Court were politically charged, while a Constitutional Court judge should play a neutral role. Dilanyan stated that he had already expressed his assessment of this statement during the hearing. "I have already mentioned that a judge, by virtue of his position, is obliged to clarify the circumstances of the case and is vested with powers in accordance with the Law on the Constitutional Court. This means that the judge takes a more active part in the process," the President of the Constitutional Court of Armenia concluded.
As a reminder, the Constitutional Court is currently discussing an appeal from seven political forces demanding a review of the parliamentary election results. During the June 29 hearing, where the judges' case was discussed, Safaryan asked opposition representatives why they had omitted from their motions the fact that "the President of the Russian Federation and a number of high-ranking officials also made statements before the Armenian elections." She inquired whether this could have influenced the election results. In response, Aram Vardevanyan, a representative of the "Strong Armenia" bloc, recalled that such a question could be raised by representatives of the "Civil Contract" party, but not by a Constitutional Court judge. He therefore stated that he would propose that the court reconsider the issue of Seda Safaryan's participation in this process.