
ArmInfo. Baku is trying to dictate "the boundaries of permissibility" to Yerevan, as stated by political analyst Suren Surenyants on his Facebook page.
"The Azerbaijani Ministry of Foreign Affairs 'strongly condemned' the burning of the Turkish flag in Yerevan, calling for those responsible to be held accountable and insisting that such actions cannot be justified by freedom of speech. Flag burning, of course, cannot be considered a constructive expression of political culture. However, value components are certainly not the basis of Baku's response," the political analyst emphasized.
Firstly, he continued, a selective approach is evident. Azerbaijan is quick to condemn the actions of private individuals in the capital of another country, while committing an act of vandalism at the state level, by destroying the Cathedral of the Holy Mother of God in Stepanakert. Secondly, Baku is reacting to the burning of a Turkish, rather than its own, national symbol, thereby not only reaffirming its allied relations but also attempting to influence Armenia's domestic agenda by shaping the "boundaries of what is permissible."
"Essentially, this is a political message from Baku, addressed to both the Armenian public and state institutions, with the aim of influencing the country's internal relations and decisions. Just like the demand to amend the Constitution. This reaction from Baku is not simply the burning of a flag. It is part of a broader strategy to exert pressure on Armenia, shape its domestic agenda, and dictate, from a position of 'winner,' what is 'acceptable' and what is not," Suren Surenyants wrote.
Recall, during the April 23 torchlight procession, participants burned a Turkish flag. This action has been condemned by Armenian authorities, including Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan.