ArmInfo.The main result of the meeting in Brussels was that meeting itself. And the problem is not at all in the venue, but in the complexity of the Armenian-Azerbaijani contradictions. Nevertheless, despite the absence of any expectations of a breakthrough, another meeting has demonstrated that the settlement process is still underway. Director of the Caucasus Institute Alexander Iskandaryan expressed a similar opinion to ArmInfo.
Following the third meeting in Brussels on May 22 in the Michel-Pashinyan-Aliyev format, an agreement was reached on further work aimed at opening regional communications, starting the work of a commission on border delimitation and security. An agreement was also reached on the next meeting in July-August of this year.
"Against the background of the actual freeze of the Minsk process, Yerevan and Baku are trying to use Brussels as a new platform for negotiations. Moscow, Washington and Paris, in turn, are not very eager to completely destroy the format of the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairmanship. The format does not work primarily because Baku does not want to talk within its framework. The Russian format of negotiations is also progressing with great difficulty, and this is where the need for Brussels arises. At the same time, it is quite difficult for me to imagine the solution of the whole complex of problems between Armenia and Azerbaijan in the EU platform in the foreseeable future, which have not been solved during the last 30 years," he said.
According to the political scientist, Aliyev is trying to extract a document from this whole process, which he can present in Baku as recognition by Armenia of the "territorial integrity of Azerbaijan", along with the territory of Artsakh. Which, for obvious reasons, puts a lot of additional problems in addition to all existing problems in the way of signing such a document by Yerevan. Baku's refusal to consider the status and rights of Artsakh Armenians in a different perspective than in terms of the rights of Azerbaijani citizens of various ethnic affiliations only exacerbates the problem. According to Iskandaryan, in reality, Azerbaijan does not need the Armenians of Artsakh at all, it needs only Artsakh itself as a territory. While the positions of Yerevan and Stepanakert are primarily aimed at protecting the rights of the Artsakh people. "So there are still differences of positions. And I don't think that they can be brought together in Brussels or anywhere else, or by reaching a consensus decision, at least in the medium term. Another difficult problem is the delimitation and demarcation of borders on in the South Caucasus, where there are no such borders at all, and there are only the borders of the former USSR, and if in the case of normal relations between the countries this process takes decades, then at least it is difficult to predict how long it will take for Armenia and Azerbaijan. So, there will be no quick decisions in this case either. But this does not mean at all that there is no need to at least start talking about this topic," Iskandaryan summed up.