ArmInfo. If Azerbaijan does not want to implement technical means to investigate border incidents on the contact line with Artsakh, then it must be compelled to do so. The vice speaker of the Armenian parliament from the Tsarukyan bloc, Mikael Melkumian, stated this during the discussion of the report of Azerbaijani delegate Sevinj Fataliyeva on the children who suffered during the armed conflicts, from the rostrum of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. "If Azerbaijan does not agree to this, it assumes all responsibility for human casualties in the Karabakh conflict zone." Our goal is not only to voice assessments, but also to apply sankitsy to those who provoke armed clashes, "Melkumyan said. In the context of the topic under discussion, he recalled the Armenian boy Vagharshak Grigoryan, who died of an Azeri bombing during the April war in 2016, as well as hundreds of children who were orphaned as a result of the Karabakh conflict. In turn, the deputy from the "Tsarukyan" bloc Naira Zohrabyan stated that the Azerbaijani Nuremberg is still ahead. She stressed that Azerbaijan, during the shelling of Armenian border settlements, specifically targets kindergartens and schools. "The policy of Armenian phobia is inculcated in Azerbaijani children from the kindergarten age, but this causes damage to Azerbaijan primarily by educating whole generations of bloodthirsty people," the Armenian deputy summed up. In turn, the representative of the Elk bloc Edmond Marukyan raised the issue of protecting Syrian children from armed attacks by Turkey. "During the attacks of Turkey, hundreds of Syrian children were killed, whether the Assembly appealed to this question, whether there was a call for Turkey to leave the territory of Syria, to stop the attack, whether the question of imposing sanctions on this country with the aim of stopping the bloodshed was considered," - said Marukyan to the PACE delegates. Note that initially the report of the Azerbaijani delegate On the children affected by the armed conflicts contained numerous one-sided, subjective, pro-Azerbaijani language, however, as a result of the efforts of the Armenian delegation, they were all withdrawn from the final version of the document.