ArmInfo. The political price of the term "transitional justice" is very high. Such an action as "transitional justice" is being undertaken in countries where all other possibilities have been exhausted, and where even if a force has come to power that has the political will to investigate crimes, society itself is not ready for this.
On January 10, Larisa Alaverdyan, executive director of the organization Against Right-Willing Abuse, said in an interview with ArmInfo correspondent.She noted that we do not have such a situation. "Today, a political force has come to power, which is determined to reveal all crimes, including those related to corruption and economic crimes. In addition, the society has completely legitimized this power, in whose hands both legislative and executive power is concentrated. And unfortunately, yes, by inertia, the judiciary is ready to carry out certain prescriptions of the new government, loudly voiced from the rostrum, "stressed Alverdyan.
The ex-ombudsman noted that we need to do everything possible to ensure that the judiciary is held in the country. And transitional justice does not help it to take place. "As for why they started talking about him, the idea itself appeared in the depths of the congress. This is a narrow party interest raised to the rank of state interest. Meanwhile, when the American University of Armenia held a discussion on transitional justice and where various international experts were invited , one of them was struck, because Armenia is completely different from Sierra Leone, where transitional justice was applied, and almost everyone who came to us found that there was no such crisis situation that required It would be such a high political price. Because we will be included in the number of countries in which dictatorial regimes were prohibitive. "
Alaverdyan also stressed that if the government wants to prove in such a way that all its promises are fulfilled, then they must understand that it is not necessary to exercise transitional justice in our country in the form in which it is fixed. It is better to implement breakthrough reforms in the judicial system, and this requires breakthrough reforms in the legislative and executive branches. "That is, by a strong-willed decision to stop any interference in the judicial system. After all, the statements of the heads of power structures:" I think so: "," We need to do this: "this is nonsense for developed countries. If earlier the executive branch pressured judges secretly, without leaving even written confirmations, today this is done through public statements, "the ex-ombudsman stressed.She also noted that the statements of the head of the National Security Service Artur Vanetsyan, who urges the public not to concentrate on the content of the wiretap records and forget everything, this reminds her of Serzh Sargsyan's policy.
"I don't have to forget anything, moreover, I believe that a special investigation should be carried out precisely on the content of this record. No one wants to punish either the heads of the security forces or the head of the country. And the people will be pleased if the authorities admit their mistakes." stressed the executive director of the public organization "Against rightful arbitrariness."To the remark of ArmInfo's correspondent that Justice Minister Artak Zeinlyan stated that transitional justice does not imply interference in the judicial system, and it will be called upon to help the judges, Alaverdyan said: "I do not agree with this position.
To help judges this means to interfere in the judicial system in some way. to help, in order for us to have a judicial system, we must not interfere with it. Neither through telephone conversations, nor through the press, should we give directions to it. We have very high literacy among law enforcement and judicial bodies, we must skillfully use The right decision should be made according to the law, not according to who will say what. The authorities have great temptations and everyone who came to power today is also subject to these temptations, you need to resist them, "Alaverdyan said."If before the power that we criticized so much and were so happy to overthrow it, put pressure on the judiciary by telephone law, verbally, now it's rising to the rank of policy. I simply call on everyone in power to remember what leverage they have. After all, if a person who is at the head of a country legally uses his levers - that's worth a lot, "concluded Alaverdyan.