ArmInfo.Sponsors and initiators of the information war unfolding in the Armenian society are deliberately trying to strike at the unity and trust of citizens towards each other and the state, Director of the Ashkharh Center for Strategic Studies (Stepanakert), military analyst Hrachya Arzumanyan expressed the opinion to ArmInfo.
"This mutual trust was most vividly manifested in April-May last year in the days of the velvet revolution." This very important factor and its positive consequences, as a whole, are not realized by society, which is normal, by the way. Meanwhile, this very society relying on mutual trust, takes control of the state and statehood. It is this kind of society that does not allow the authorities to transform themselves into a handful of people pursuing the selfish goals of gaining revenues from state functions and structures, "he stressed.
With the change of power, a real information war has unfolded in Armenian media and social networks with the participation of supporters of Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, supporters of the former ruling Republican Party, and supporters of former President Robert Kocharyan. Former members of the RPA and persons affiliated with Kocharyan periodically acquire TV channels, newspapers, create new Internet resources, whose work focuses solely on criticism of the current government. In social networks, there are numerous fake accounts working on various politicians, as a rule, spreading also disinformation. Hundreds of journalists and dozens of information resources generate and spread fake news.
According to the analyst, it was in the days of the "velvet revolution" that the Armenian society demonstrated the ability of cohesion, mutual trust towards any Armenian, and not just their own family or clan. It was then that the awareness of one's own power, the ability to build a new, different Armenia, based on mutual trust of citizens and the state was manifested. Extremely limited number of societies have such trust. Acknowledging the mistakes made by the new Armenian authorities, Arzumanyan expressed the hope that many of them are the result of inexperience. And, accordingly, will be eliminated, including through the dismissal of persons who make these mistakes. He is also confident that otherwise it will be the preservation of mutual trust in society that will allow for a new change of power, however, no longer in revolutionary, but in milder ways. The analyst is convinced that only a society based on such values will allow Armenia to develop at a rapid pace and achieve qualitatively new results in a limited period of time. In this light, maintaining a sense of trust in society, not only in conditions of war, but also in conditions of peace, in his opinion, is an extremely important condition for building a truly new Armenian statehood.