ArmInfo. Elections in Azerbaijan, the end of President Serzh Sargsyan's term in Armenia, as well as the cooperation of the US and Russia can create conditions for the resolution of the conflict in Karabakh.
As DW reports, this opinion was expressed by foreign experts who participated in the Round Table in Brussels, dedicated to the Karabakh problem.
Nevertheless, the analyst of the Center for Regional Studies David Shahnazaryan expressed the opinion that the parties have never been so far from the peace agreement as today. "I think the possibility of a new war is still very high," he said.
Other participants of the roundtable agreed that such a risk still exists. There are many reasons for concern over the possible continuation of the conflict, because the parties not only strengthened their military presence on the contact line, but also the militaristic moods in the society grow both in Armenia and Azerbaijan, the round table participants noted. However, not all were pessimistic.
Thus, the director of the British analytical center LINKS Denis Sammut sees the possibility of progress in the peace negotiations. To this end, according to him, appropriate conditions are necessary within Armenia and Azerbaijan, as well as at the international level. For both countries, next week will be filled with important political events.
"The presidential elections will be held in Azerbaijan on April 11. They should have been held this autumn, but the current head of state Ilham Aliyev postponed the date of their holding, observers expect that Aliyev will be re-elected and will go on his fourth term, now not five years but seven years And the second and last presidential term of Serzh Sargsyan will end on April 9. However, he is expected to remain in power, thanks to the constitutional referendum of 2015. Changes in the Basic Law of Armenia turn Armenia into a parliamentary a republic where the power will be concentrated in the hands of the prime minister, who, most likely, will become Sargsyan, "DW notes.
"The leaders of both countries will have unprecedented political power and space to work on the (Karabakh - Ed.) issue if they want," Sammut said. He admits that before the previous elections there were already suggestions that after them everything would change. The expert believes the current situation is somewhat different and therefore says: "Now the moment when something can happen, something positive ... The next six to eight months will be important, and we can see a movement that has not been so far".
Zaur Shiriyev, a member of the Crisis Group, an organization like LINKS, engaged not only in analytics, but also contributing to the settlement of conflicts, is less optimistic. But he does not rule out possible progress. At the same time, the expert points out that the Azerbaijani government expects results from the authorities in the resolution of the Karabakh issue, and that both countries will celebrate this year the 100th anniversary of the founding of the republics in their territories.
Although the situation at the international level is not so favorable, given the difficult relations on several other issues between the OSCE Minsk Group co-chairs for the Karabakh conflict settlement - Russia, the United States and France, they have mutual understanding within the framework of cooperation on Nagorno-Karabakh, experts say.
Thus, David Shahnazaryan points to the change in Moscow's position last summer. If before that the Kremlin was ready to take steps and without consulting with other co-chairs, in the past about eight months there has been "very close cooperation." "In the current geopolitical situation, there are not so many formats where the US and Russia can work with each other, and this is one of such sites," the expert points out, and calls it one of the reasons for stability on the line of contact.
The possibility of such cooperation is recognized by Sammut, while adding: US representatives and earlier said that relations with Russia in the Minsk Group are different from other spheres. In addition, Russia's relations with another player in the region-Turkey are now positive.
According to political scientist Andrei Makarychev, who teaches at the University of Tartu, Moscow's main interest is the preservation of the status quo. Therefore, it tries to keep Baku from a military solution. And the authorities of the Russian Federation are trying to convey to Yerevan that Russian troops in this country will act only in case of threat to the internationally recognized territory of Armenia, explained Makarychev. And also Moscow is trying to keep Yerevan from too strong a pro-Western orientation.
Despite the fact that the EU is gaining increasing importance in the South Caucasus, nevertheless, says Sammut, neither Baku nor Yerevan want the direct participation of the EU in the conflict settlement and does not give Brussels a big role in this matter.
Therefore, the participants of the event urged the EU to more clearly define its approach to the region. And if we are not talking about joining the Minsk Group, then at least it is necessary to hold meetings with its co-chairs and strengthen the mandate of the EU special representative for the South Caucasus, experts noted.
Meanwhile, Shiriyev warns that if the next escalation occurs, then it will be more extensive. According to him, in 2016, battles were limited both territorially and in the number of troops and equipment involved. "The next escalation," April plus, "will be more devastating than what happened two years ago," - cautions the expert.